prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji
  Download
PDF 422.06 KB
master's thesis
Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji
2020. urn:nbn:hr:120:611756
Nikolić, Antun
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo
Department of Systematic Teology
Chair of Dogmatic Theology

Cite this document

Nikolić, A. (2020). Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Nikolić, Antun. "Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, 2020. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Nikolić, Antun. "Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, 2020. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Nikolić, A. (2020). 'Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji', Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, accessed 02 May 2021, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Nikolić A. Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji [Master's thesis]. Đakovo: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo; 2020 [cited 2021 May 02] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

A. Nikolić, "Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji", Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, Đakovo, 2020. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Islandora Bookmark - Please login to use this feature
Metadata
TitleIzabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji
Title (english)Selected contemporary models of interpretation of the teaching of transubstantiation
AuthorAntun Nikolić
MentorBoris Vulić (mentor)
Committee memberVladimir Dugalić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberŠimo Šokčević (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberBoris Vulić (član povjerenstva)
GranterJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo
(Department of Systematic Teology)
(Chair of Dogmatic Theology)
Đakovo
Defense date and country2020-10-14, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Theology
Dogmatic Theology
Abstract
Euharistijsku teologiju bilo kojeg teologa možemo načelno smjestiti između dviju krajnosti: s jedne strane je krajnji realizam – potpuna istovjetnost između Kristova tijela i euharistijskih darova, a s druge strane je krajnji simbolizam – euharistijski darovi samo predstavljaju Kristovo tijelo. Cilj rada je protumačiti dogmu o transupstancijaciji, koja je bliža krajnosti realizma. Prvo proučavamo njen nastanak. Razvijana je u teološkim raspravama razvijenog srednjeg vijeka. Njeno vrhunsko filozofsko-teološko tumačenje dao je Toma Akvinski, a na Tridentskom saboru ona ima središnje mjestu u definiranju euharistijskog nauka. Nakon sabora malo je koji katolički teolog zastupao neku od spomenutih krajnosti. Napretkom znanosti u 20. st. pojam supstancije biva osporavan, što 60-ih godina rezultira raspravom o transupstancijacijskoj dogmi. U ovoj raspravi B. Welte, P. Schoonenberg i E. Schillebeeckx su teolozi sa simbolističkim tendencijama. Pritom se oslanjaju na personalističku filozofiju i na filozofiju Martina Heideggera. Među onima koji, unatoč znanstvenim spoznajama 20. st., uočavaju trajno važeću realističku srž proučavane dogme prikazujemo misli K. Rahnera, R. Spaemanna i J. Ratzingera.
Abstract (english)
The Eucharistic theology of any theologian can in principle be placed between two extremes: on the one hand is the ultimate realism - the complete identity between the body of Christ and the Eucharistic gifts, and on the other is the ultimate symbolism - the Eucharistic gifts only represent the body of Christ. The aim of this paper is to interpret the dogma of transubstantiation, which is closer to the extreme of realism. We first study its origin. It was developed in the theological treatises of the High Middle Ages. Its supreme philosophical-theological interpretation was given by st. Thomas Aquinas, and at the Council of Trent it has a central place in defining the Eucharistic doctrine. After the council, few Catholic theologians advocated any of the aforementioned extremes. With the advancement of science in the 20th century, the notion of substance was challenged, resulting in a discussion about transubstantiation dogma in the 1960s. In this discussion B. Welte, P. Schoonenberg, and E. Schillebeeckx are theologians with symbolist tendencies. In doing so, they rely on personalist philosophy and the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. Among those who, despite of the scientific knowledge of the 20th century, notice the permanently valid realistic core of the studied dogma, we present the thoughts of K. Rahner, R. Spaemann and J. Ratzinger.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:120:611756
Study programmeTitle: Study of Philosophy and Theology
Study programme type: university
Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/ magistra teologije (magistar/ magistra teologije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2020-10-19 06:57:36